All question types · Kinetics
Steady state: A ⇌ I → P
UKChO Round 2 · IChO · unreviewed
A ⇌ I → P with all three rate constants known; steady state on I.
Worked example
A reacts through an intermediate: A ⇌ I (k₁ = 0.58 s⁻¹, k₋₁ = 1700 s⁻¹), then I → P (k₂ = 1100 s⁻¹). Apply the steady-state approximation to I and find k_eff.
1. Multiply k₁ × k₂ → k₁k₂
= 638.0 s⁻²
2. Add k₋₁ + k₂
= 2800 s⁻¹
3. Divide k₁k₂ ÷ (k₋₁ + k₂) → k_eff
= 0.2279 s⁻¹
Answer: k_eff = 0.228 s⁻¹
Method
d[I]/dt = k₁[A] − k₋₁[I] − k₂[I] = 0 gives [I] = k₁[A]/(k₋₁ + k₂), so rate = k₂[I] = k₁k₂[A]/(k₋₁ + k₂): k_eff = k₁k₂/(k₋₁ + k₂).
Common mistakes
- That is the pre-equilibrium result k₁k₂/k₋₁, which needs k₋₁ ≫ k₂. Here they are comparable: use the steady-state expression.
- That takes the first step as rate-determining, which only holds when k₂ ≫ k₋₁.
More kinetics questions
- First order: concentration after time t
- Activation energy from two rate constants
- Second-order half-life
- Pre-equilibrium then half-life
- Lindemann–Hinshelwood fall-off
- Michaelis–Menten rate
- Radioactive decay: elapsed time
- ΔG‡ from a rate constant
- Time for a second-order reaction to reach a concentration
- Rate constant from total pressure
- Apparent activation energy of a pre-equilibrium mechanism
- 2NO + O₂: pre-equilibrium with bimolecular steps
- Lindemann mechanism at a given pressure
- From ΔG‡ to a reaction time at another temperature
- Enzyme kinetics from elementary rate constants